Trade Secret Settlement Agreement

In 2002, Iowa Parts began manufacturing competing spare parts. The court`s decision. The trial judge approved the parties who objected to the motion for enforcement. In principle, the transaction was not identical in all respects essential to the decision which the applicant wished to have taken. The court stated that the subjective objective of the absence of non-competition was not relevant, in the absence of a non-competition clause, allegedly to protect the applicant. The defendants never accepted a settlement without this provision, so the court was unable to accept the application for enforcement. WHY SHOULD YOU KNOW? The great thing about trade secrets is that they can encompass a wide range of economically advantageous methods, formulas, business processes, etc. There`s even room to take information that everyone knows or is easily accessible, and to find new ways to use it. Mark Halligan, the trade secret guru, calls this “combination analysis.” . . .

Posted in Uncategorized
Skip to toolbar